– By BHUMIKA
– Intern IPPCS’21
The global arena is a stage where every state is for itself. Choices should be made while calculating ahead, keeping the picture of future consequences in mind. The status quo urges individual states to tread carefully on these spike ridden paths. At a time when the mighty dragon is getting ready to warm up its seat at the centre of the global stage, one can’t help but wonder whether it’s wise to play the game against its wishes and command? Taiwan is a burgeoning economic and democratic state, one which harbours immense potential for being an active political member. Yet, it has failed to get the much needed diplomatic recognition from the main players of this ever-running global game.
Today, Taiwan has its own laws, a particular political framework, and a flourishing economy known for its sizable impression in worldwide inventory chains for medium-and very good quality innovative items. However these attributes have not decreased the red lines that central area China tries to force on nations that arrange with Taiwan. As China never ceases to map out the red lines for nations who seem to plan about being associated with this island country. For the most part, countries find it difficult to adjust the political ramifications of sheltering closer ties with Taiwan alongside their own interests involving mainland China. India’s relationship with Taiwan works out in this complex discretionary labyrinth.
Before the Britishers were driven out of India and the Communist revolutionaries in China strongly coerced the KMT to withdraw to Taiwan in 1949, the leaders of both the countries enjoyed close linkage. There have been various instances where they demonstrated an affinity with the other. Other than Nehru’s trip to mainland China in 1939, KMT’s Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek and his wife’s visit to New Delhi and Kolkata in 1942 is considered as one of the most important meets between the two countries as Chiang was the first major non-European political figure who met the leaders spearheading Indian independence efforts.
Alas, right off the bat in the Cold War during the 1950s and 1960s, the political distance among India and Taiwan developed, as Nehru’s international strategy technique of non-alignment was at odds with the counter Communist (and against China) union that KMT
pioneers were combining with the United States. India’s help for mainland China’s enrollment on the UN Security Council (supplanting Chiang and the KMT-drove, Taiwan-based Republic of China in 1971) further demolished relations. In the midst of the scenery of the Cold War, the India-Taiwan relationship for the most part stayed as a second thought until the mid 1990s.
To make up for the lost formal strategic ties with Taiwan, New Delhi set up the India Taipei Association (ITA) in March 1995 to help the different sides organize more. The partner in India is the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center (TECC) in New Delhi, which was set up that very year; likewise, there are currently additional TECC workplaces in Chennai, Kolkata, and Mumbai. The two foundations offer consular and identification benefits and advance exchange and business joins, logical trades, and individuals-to-individuals interactions. Over the years, two-sided commitment among India and Taiwan has step by step improved. Especially important achievements incorporate, however are not restricted to, the commencement of non-stop trips between New Delhi and Taipei in 2003 and a progression of visits by huge political figures including the former president A.P.J. Abdul Kalam and KMT official Ma Ying-jeou.
In spite of this developing commitment, India’s situation on the last goal of the Taiwan issue has remained somewhat enigmatic. In a January 2008 joint articulation, India recognized the One China strategy and pledged to oppose any activity that is against the one China principle. After a 2010 joint report, Beijing and New Delhi have delivered no extra joint assertions regarding the matter.
The political connection among India and Taiwan intermittently has been confounded by issues of protocol. In May 2016, India is said to change courses on an earlier obligation to send two parliamentarians to Tsai’s official introduction, even as different dignitaries including administrators from Singapore and an individual from the European Parliament were available for the occasion.
At the economic front as well things aren’t looking that celebratory. In the interim, India and Taiwan’s monetary relationship is a lot more modest than it ought to be. Bilateral exchange drifts around 1% of total trade for both countries. India was just Taiwan’s sixteenth-biggest exchanging accomplice in 2017, a positioning predominated by Taiwan’s exchange streams
with central area China. Trade between central areas China and Taiwan added up to $139 billion in 2017, while India-Taiwan exchange earned somewhat more than $6 billion.
India must take on a down to earth approach while managing Taiwan. Such a policy involves balancing the truth of clinging to the country’s essential One China strategy (prefaced on the one country, two frameworks model) to develop a more ordinary relationship with Taipei. Regarding Taiwan as a Chinese compel to acquire influence would oppose India’s and Taiwan’s improvement objectives. New Delhi and Taipei ought to try not to overemphasize government-to-government relations (or related political gimmicks). Instead, the different sides should zero in on reliably progressing diverse drives pointed toward upgrading business ties and individuals-to-individuals trades through committed Taiwan-centered work areas—like those in Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam—in significant urban communities across India. Tsai’s New Southbound Policy is designed to attract the attention of investors in countries like India with a distinct focus on local populations.
To guarantee that the India-Taiwan relationship is dependable and strong, these endeavors ought to be driven by uplifting objectives, for example, setting up assembling supply chains, developing a South Asia Silicon Valley, or essentially running after profoundly established financial reliance, instead of being inspired by any danger presented by central area China. Such a course revision would keep on serving Indian and Taiwanese interests best, as these means would not involve a by and large dismissal of expressed arrangement responsibilities like the One China strategy.
References:
1. Sana Hashmi, A Missing Link in the Quad: India’s Support for Taiwan, The Diplomat, July 16, 2021
2. Joe Thomas Karackattu, The case for a pragmatic Indian-Taiwan Partnership, Carnegie India, April 2019
3. John C. Copper, Taiwan- self governing island, Britannica, Sept 12, 2021
onducted a total of five underground nuclear tests, breaking a 24-year self-imposed moratorium on nuclear testing. Pakistan followed, claiming 5 tests on May 28, 1998, and an additional test on May 30. The unannounced tests created a global storm of criticism, as well as a serious setback for decades of U.S. nuclear nonproliferation efforts in South Asia. On May 13, 1998, President Clinton imposed economic and military sanctions on India, mandated by Section 102 of the Arms Export Control Act (AECA), and applied the same sanctions to Pakistan on May 30. Some effects of the sanctions on India included: termination of $21 million in FY1998 economic development assistance; postponement of $1.7 billion in lending by the International Financial Institutions (IFI), as supported by the Group of Eight (G-8) leading industrial nations; prohibition on loans or credit from U.S. banks to the government of India; and termination of Foreign Military Sales under the Arms Export Control Act. Humanitarian assistance, food, or other agricultural commodities are excepted from sanctions under the law. 
The first ministerial level meeting of QUAD was held on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly in New York. Before this, the QUAD had
AusIndEx is an exercise between India and Australia which was first held in 2015.The Australian 
On recommendations of the Japanese government, the four countries met at Manila, Philippines for ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) originally, but also ended up having a meeting of what we call the first meeting of four nation states on issues of 
On his official visit to India, Japanese PM Mr. Shinzo Abe reinforced the ties of two nations, i.e., Japan and India with his famous speech about 
In 2007, Japanese President Shinzo Abe resigned from his post citing health reasons. This had a significant impact on QUAD as he was the architect & advocate of QUAD. His successor, Yasuo Fukuda, did not take up QUAD with such zeal leading to dormancy of the forum. (
Japan earthquake and tsunami of 2011, also called Great Sendai Earthquake or Great Tōhoku Earthquake, was a 9.0 magnitude earthquake which struck below the floor of the Western Pacific at 2:49 PM. The powerful earthquake affected the northeastern coast of Honshu, Japan’s main island, and also initiated a series of large tsunami waves that devastated coastal areas of Japan, which also led to a major nuclear accident. Japan received aid from India, US, Australia as well as other countries. US Navy aircraft carrier was dispatched to the area and Australia sent search-and-rescue teams. 
India and Australia signed the 
The India-Japan Agreement for Cooperation in the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy was signed on 11 November, 2016 and came into force on 20 July, 2017 which was representative of strengthening ties between India and Japan. Diplomatic notes were exchanged between Dr. S. Jaishankar and H.E. Mr. Kenji Hiramatsu, Ambassador of Japan to India. (
The foreign ministry
The Officials of QUAD member countries met in Singapore on November 15, 2018 for consultation on regional & global issues of common interest. The main discussion revolved around connectivity, sustainable development, counter-terrorism, maritime and cyber security, with the view to promote peace, stability and prosperity in the 
The 23rd edition of trilateral Malabar maritime exercise between India, US and Japan took place on 26 September- 04 October, 2019 off the coast of Japan. 
After the first ministerial level meeting of QUAD in September, 2019, the senior officials of US, Japan, India and Australia again met for consultations in Bangkok on the margins of the East Asia Summit. Statements were issued separately by the four countries. Indian Ministry of External Affairs said “In statements issued separately by the four countries, MEA said, “proceeding from the strategic guidance of their Ministers, who met in New York City on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly recently, the officials exchanged views on ongoing and additional practical cooperation in the areas of connectivity and infrastructure development, and security matters, including counterterrorism, cyber and maritime security, with a view to promoting peace, security, stability, prosperity in the Indo-Pacific region.”
US 2+2 Ministerial Dialogue was held on 18 December, 2019, in Washington DC. Secretary of State Michael R. Pompeo and Secretary of Defense Mark T. Esper will host Indian Minister of External Affairs Dr. S. Jaishankar and Minister of Defense Shri Rajnath Singh. The discussion focussed on deepening bilateral strategic and defense cooperation, exchanging perspectives on global developments, and our shared leadership in the Indo-Pacific region.The two democracies signed the Industrial Security Annex before the 2+2 Dialogue. Assessments of the situation in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Nepal, Sri Lanka, and the Indian Ocean region in general were shared between both countries. (
The foreign ministers of QUAD continued their discussions from the last ministerial level meeting in 2019, on 6 October, 2020. While there was no joint statement released, all countries issued individual readouts. As per the issue readout by India, the discussion called for a coordinated response to the challenges including financial problems emanating from the pandemic, best practices to combat Covid-19, increasing the resilience of supply chains, and enhancing access to affordable vaccines, medicines and medical equipment. There was also a focus on maintaining stability in the Indo-Pacific region amidst growing tensions. Australian media release mentions “We emphasised that, especially during a pandemic, it was vital that states work to ease tensions and avoid exacerbating long-standing disputes, work to counter disinformation, and refrain from malicious cyberspace activity. Ministers reiterated that states cannot assert maritime claims that are inconsistent with international law, particularly the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).”
On September 24, President Biden hosted Prime Minister Scott Morrison of Australia, Prime Minister Narendra Modi of India, and Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga of Japan at the White House for the first-ever in-person Leaders’ Summit of the QUAD. The leaders released a Joint Statement which summarised their dialogue and future course of action. The regional security of the Indo-Pacific and strong confidence in the ASEAN remained on the focus along with response to the Pandemic. 
The QUAD Vaccine Partnership was announced at the first QUAD Summit on 12 March 2021 where QUAD countries agreed to deliver 1.2 billion vaccine doses globally. The aim was to expand and finance vaccine manufacturing and equipping the Indo-Pacific to build resilience against Covid-19. The launch of a senior-level QUAD Vaccine Experts Group, comprised of top scientists and officials from all QUAD member governments was also spearheaded. 
Although the Tsunami Core group had to be disbanded on fulfilment of its purpose, however the quadrilateral template that formed remained intact as a successful scaffolding of four countries, as stated by authors Patrick Gerard Buchan and Benjamin Rimland in their diplomatic brief about QUAD ( you can access the brief at 
Secretary of State Colin Powell stated that the Core Tsunami Group was to be disbanded and folded and clubbed with the broader United Nations led Relief Operations. In a Tsunami Relief Conference in Jakarta, Secretary Powell stated that 
Soon after the Earthquake and Tsunami crisis, humanitarian reliefs by countries, viz., US, India, Japan, and Australia started to help the 13 havoc-stricken countries. The US initially promised $ 35 Millions in aid. However, on 29
At 7:59AM local time, an earthquake of 9.1 magnitude (undersea) hit the coast of Sumatra, an Indonesian island. As a result of the same, massive waves of Tsunami triggered by the earthquake wreaked havoc for 7 hours across the Indian Ocean and to the coastal areas as far away as East Africa. The infamous Tsunami killed around 225,000 people, with people reporting the height of waves to be as high as 9 metres, i.e., 30 feet. Indonesia, Srilanka, India, Maldives, Thailand sustained horrendously massive damage, with the death toll exceeding 200,000 in Northern Sumatra’s Ache province alone. A great many people, i.e., around tens of thousands were found dead or missing in Srilanka and India, mostly from Andaman and Nicobar Islands of Indian territory. Maldives, being a low-lying country, also reported casualties in hundreds and more, with several non-Asian tourists reported dead or missing who were vacationing. Lack of food, water, medicines burgeoned the numbers of casualties, with the relief workers finding it difficult to reach the remotest areas where roads were destroyed or civil war raged. Long-term environmental damage ensued too, as both natural and man-made resources got demolished and diminished.
No responses yet