– By P. Sai Sathya Prakash

Introduction

Today’s world is reshaping with the evolution of multilateralism and multilateral dialogue, anticipating a normative world order that incorporates and benefits nations. Chinese expansionism in recent times has led to the emergence of the arc of convergence of strategic interests between the other states. After gaining geostrategic influence in the South China Sea, China adopts a similar expansionist approach in the Indian Ocean Region, Sino-Indian border disputes, Taiwan Strait and Indo-Pacific region. The Indo-Pacific region   extends from the West Pacific to the East coast of Africa, and is central to the world economy and world peace Today, It has become the lexicon of the foreign policy of India. Many multilateral dialogues like QUAD and AUKUS are emerging to balance the region and promote stable rule-based world order. 

There are multiple Indo-Pacific alliances till present, including QUAD, Five Eyes, ANZUS and most recently, AUKUS. QUAD is exclusively a non-military alliance and focuses more on trade, climate change and global commons. Five Eyes partnership is an anglosphere intelligence alliance comprising the US, UK, Australia, Canada and New Zealand for cooperation in intelligence sharing. ANZUS is a security treaty among Australia, New Zealand and the US, Which has become too narrow, non-binding and lacks relevance today. On the other hand, AUKUS focuses on military capabilities, since the Indo-Pacific region requires a proactive military alliance.. On September 15, 2021, An enhanced trilateral security partnership was announced by the leaders of the United Kingdom, the United States and Australia, referred to as AUKUS. The inception of AUKUS raised a conflict of interest among various scholars resulting in debating the numerous impacts of AUKUS on the Indo-Pacific Region. One question often raised is, ‘Is QUAD significance diminished due to AUKUS?’. 

The QUAD and The AUKUS

The QUAD or Quadrilateral Security Dialogue between the US, Australia, India and Japan is an informal strategic forum to ensure rule-based world order, promoting freedom of navigation and encouraging a liberal trading system. The inception of QUAD started during the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami. In 2007 Shinzo Abe, then Prime Minister of Japan, formalised the alliance based around maritime security. It was disbanded soon due to a lack of cohesion among members. Due to the Chinese aggression and rapid expansionism, QUAD was revived to balance the region by expanding its existing agreements and promoting shared values. QUAD is often misinterpreted as an Asian NATO. However, it does not include collective defence. Instead, it focuses on addressing issues like climate change, cyberspace, COVID 19 crisis management, vaccine diplomacy, trade and investments, technological cooperation and maritime security The QUAD aims to prevent  Chinese monopoly and provide an alternative evident system.

Whereas AUKUS is a trilateral security partnership between the United Kingdom, the United States and Australia, the announcement of AUKUSt came just before the QUAD summit on September 24, 2021. AUKUS is a narrow defence pact and focuses only on security and defence cooperation in the Indo-Pacific region. AUKUS aims to bring the UK close to the Indo-Pacific region and share nuclear Submarine Technology with Australia to acquire nuclear-powered submarines. Australia now can enter the South-China Sea and allow it to counter Chinese aggression. Since other Indo-Pacific alliances are non-military, for instance, India’s policy of not engaging in any military security pacts directly in the Indo-Pacific and Japan’s sensitivity about nuclear technology allows the UK, US and Australia to form AUKUS makes sense.

The Synergy Between QUAD and AUKUS

However, AUKUS and QUAD share a vision to balance the Indo-Pacific region. QUAD is a broader multilateral dialogue and works on the members’ shared interests. At the same time, AUKUS is a narrow security treaty and pure military deterrence. Its main aim is to protect the Indo-Pacific region from Chinese influence. Recently many scholars have argued that ‘AUKUS has nothing to do with QUAD’, ‘No links between AUKUS or QUAD’ or ‘AUKUS do not affect the functioning of QUAD’, Nevertheless, in the context of the QUAD, AUKUS has relevance and significance in the long term as both of the alliances share a similar vision that is the free and open Indo Pacific. All the Indo-pacific alliances complement each other resulting in a more prominent political and strategic consensus. Until now, all the partnerships were either political, diplomatic or mini lateral and lacked the defence and security dimension formally. The more considerable security and strategic burden shift to AUKUS will help QUAD retain its ASEAN centrality and power dynamics. Therefore, AUKUS addresses the defence partnership by assertively upgrading military power to work as an efficient deterrence against China when needed. Thus, It may not diminish the role of QUAD as both have specific plans, different objectives and diverse strategies but certainly have significance on QUAD. 

Indian Perspective

Currently, India is aware of Chinese ambitions to achieve an Unipolar Asia. India’s new offensive-defensive doctrine is no more  defensive about partnering with the West to balance the region. India believes that preventing Chinese influence is not only the reason for the emergence of these multilateral dialogues. The purpose of these multilateral dialogues is also to work on climate change, cooperation on emerging technologies, blue economy, academic collaborations and vaccine diplomacy to bring regional stability. Hence the announcement of AUKUS brought divided opinions in India. Shri Harsh Vardhan Shringla, India’s foreign secretary, gave a formal response that AUKUS is not relevant to the QUAD and will not have any impact on its functioning. Many welcomed AUKUS because now the security domain expectations from QUAD will reduce. India can improve its non-military domain in the Indo-Pacific region after the post COVID world.

Moreover, a firm and capable Australia will go well with India’s interests to continue joint naval exercises, thus bolstering India-Australia strategic and defence cooperation. Nevertheless, many scholars feelfe India is left out as only one QUAD member has access to the US nuclear submarine technology. This announcement also built empathy for India’s closer defence partner France. Other scholars were sceptical about this partnership. Some argued that China might get provocative. There is a possibility that it will destabilise Western Pacific, which can be consequential to the Indian Ocean region. Others felt that strengthening Australian defence would mitigate India’s border conflict with China. Having foreign submarines presence in Indian waters and near the sea will only hamper India’s influence in the region, although Australia is a closer defence partner and QUAD member. Admiral Arun Prakash, former naval chief, objected that two Asian QUAD members- India and Japan were not included. It can also lead to regional imbalance, As the regional members will be left out if AUKUS, under strategic cooperation, also shares Artificial Intelligence and cyber operations. 

India maintains a defensive, subtle, and direct response to AUKUS regarding China. India is not prepared to enter the Anti-China alliance and evolve as Pro-West. India is trying to balance the West and Russia and other players to counter Chinese influence. India not joining any alliance will signal India’s aspirations as a rising power to the West. Moreover, India’s stance that maintains strategic ambiguity is the best way to mitigate future evolving threats. Thus, If China continues to exhibit territorial aggression, India will always have a window open to seek US support. Otherwise, India can continue supporting AUKUS and actively engaging in QUAD dialogues, thereby indirectly opposing China. This power play allows India to stay strategic autonomy and not directly move against China, allowing the USA and China to continue the indo-pacific game. When both the states start declining, India will be left out to pursue its global ambitions. 

Conclusion 

Hence the question, ‘Is QUAD significance diminished due to AUKUS?’, the possibility can be most unlikely since both the alliances have different objectives and purposes. Although AUKUS will not compete but only complement QUAD, It is evident that AUKUS can influence the Indian stake and authority in the Indian Ocean region and neighborhood. Thus, India has to be very careful while articulating any formal stance on this security pact considering the possible consequences. 

Tags:

No responses yet

Leave a Reply

Latest Comments

No comments to show.